Homeland Security formalizes laptop seizure rules -- sort of


For months it's been the policy (written or unwritten, no one is sure), that the
Department of Homeland Security can do pretty much whatever it wants with your
laptop, cell phone, or other electronic gadgets when you, a U.S. citizen, return
to the country from overseas.


It's understandable why they want our laptops: If you're a terrorist, chances
are you have the plans to destroy the world just sitting in your inbox, and the
feds would like the chance to read them while you're waiting in line at the
airport. But going through multiple gigabytes of data takes time, and so DHS has
filled its vaults with the laptops of the multitude, often sitting on them for
months and years as they try to figure out what to do with the bounty.


Consumer rights groups haven't exactly been thrilled with all the arbitrary
searches and seizures, and for months they've been pressing for DHS to formalize
and clarify the rules on what it can do. At
last, the department has
.


Sort of.


There's some good news in the new rules: Customs finally recognizes that
holding on to a laptop for a couple of years can greatly inconvenience the life
of anyone unfortunate enough to find themselves under suspicion, and is relaxing
-- a little -- the rules about what it will do during a laptop seizure.


The big change is that it states owners should normally be present during any
laptop search and that equipment should be returned quickly. But, as Ars
Technica notes, there are numerous and vague exceptions to all of this, with
exemptions granted for national security issues (why else would they search the
laptop in the first place?) and for whatever "circumstances of the matter" the
agency feels appropriate.


There are some basic rules for how long they can keep your laptop now, too,
with Customs having up to 30 days to hold on to it, depending on which agency
actually takes it. And as Ars also notes, "the standards for seizure remain very
low."


And so it goes. The new rules are really just policy guidelines, so
exceptions will be legion and continued abuses are almost certain, but it's good
at least to have something on paper that we can complain about. Complaining
about things may still be tilting at windmills -- but at least now we don't have
to imagine the windmills.





 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • No trackbacks exist for this post.
Comments
Page: 1 of 1
Page: 1 of 1
Leave a comment

 Name

 Email (will not be published)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.